linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] debugfs: Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111024093829.GA2214@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:38:29 +0200
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Raghavendra K T <raghukt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
	Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Xen <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] debugfs: Renaming of xen functions and change
 unsigned to u32

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:58:47PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 10/24/2011 03:49 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:34:59AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> >>Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32.
> >
> >Why not just rename when you move the functions?  Why the extra step?
> >
> Intention was only clarity. Yes, if this patch is an overhead, I 'll
> combine both the patches.

Yeah, it makes more sense as it originally confused me why you were
adding a "xen_*" function to the debugfs core code :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/