[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024113537.GH8708@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:35:37 +0200
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, patches@...aro.org,
tony@...mide.com, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
lrg@...com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: helper routine to extract
regulator_init_data
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 05:11:58PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:26:49PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> > On Monday 24 October 2011 02:32 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > >Okay, it's wrong then since so many people say it's wrong :) I guess
> > >a quick fix would be adding one property in device tree node for
> > >matching some unique field in regulator_desc, id, maybe? Mark, any
> > >suggestion?
> >
> > Thats basically what the DT compatible property is for :)
>
> But adding compatible property will get DT core create 'struct dev'
> for each regulator node, while we are trying to avoid that since
> regulator core has been doing this.
By design, of_platform_populate() will only go one level deep except
if it matches the passed in list of bus compatible properties. Having
a compatible property does not necessarily create a struct dev.
That said, I agree with you that a compatible property isn't really
needed in the child nodes **if it is defined as part of the parent
node's binding**.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists