lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:03:06 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"virtualization\@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
	"Michael S.Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Add platform bus driver for memory mapped virtio device

On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:57:24 +0100, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 03:57 +0100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Oh, really? My host-side implementation is just doing that:
> > > 
> > >         addr += align - 1;
> > >         addr &= ~(align - 1);
> > 
> > OK, so you're assuming power of 2.  Make sure you kill the guest or at
> > least the device if it's not though.
> 
> Yep, I have assertions all around such places :-) (it's a non-production
> code yet so I can do that)
> 
> > > \item The dynamic configuration changes, as described in p. 2.4.3
> > > ``Dealing With Configuration Changes'' are not permitted.
> > 
> > This means some devices simply won't work, at least in theory.  Why
> > don't you support this?
> 
> Uh. I simply forgot about it - my Host block device doesn't do that, so
> I ignored that feature initially and then it slipped through cracks. And
> till now I didn't realize that most of the drivers actually use this :-O
> My fault.
> 
> Simple to fix anyway - I'll just add InterruptStatus register and use
> second bit (same with InterruptACK) to get this through. Will be done on
> Monday.
> 
> Any other final complaints regarding the interface while I'm on it? ;-)

No, that's it I think.  Please send a diff for the documentation, since
I'm updating the LyX master and I've already applied your previous
version.

Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ