[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024134930.GD26033@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:49:30 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>, patches@...aro.org,
tony@...mide.com, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
lrg@...com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: helper routine to extract
regulator_init_data
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:40:26PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -2673,7 +2673,8 @@ struct regulator_dev *regulator_register(struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
> BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&rdev->notifier);
>
> /* find device_node and attach it */
> - rdev->dev.of_node = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, regulator_desc->name);
> + rdev->dev.of_node = of_find_node_by_name(dev->parent->of_node,
> + regulator_desc->name);
>
Is that going to do the right thing if you've got a MFD which does
register each regulator as a separate device? Might be best to just
search within dev and get drivers to pass the "real" device in when
registering the regulator rather than the virtual device.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists