[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024141253.GF26649@sapphire.tkos.co.il>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:12:54 +0200
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: robherring2@...il.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] ARM: at91: dt: at91sam9g45 family and board
device tree files
Hi Nicolas,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:05:00PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Create a new device tree source file for Atmel at91sam9g45 SoC family.
> The Evaluation Kit at91sam9m10g45ek includes it.
> This first basic support will be populated as drivers and boards will be
> converted to device tree.
> Contains serial, dma and interrupt controllers.
>
> The generic board file still takes advantage of platform data for early serial
> init. As we need a storage media and the NAND flash driver is not converted to
> DT yet, we keep old initialization for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +DT_MACHINE_START(at91sam9m10g45ek_dt, "Atmel AT91SAM (Device Tree)")
Since this is a generic AT91 machine descriptor, won't "at91sam_dt" be a more
appropriate name?
> + /* Maintainer: Atmel */
> + .timer = &at91sam926x_timer,
> + .map_io = at91_map_io,
> + .init_early = ek_init_early,
> + .init_irq = at91_dt_init_irq,
> + .init_machine = at91_dt_device_init,
> + .dt_compat = at91_dt_board_compat,
> +MACHINE_END
baruch
--
~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@...s.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists