[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024144716.GG1755@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:47:17 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>, <patches@...aro.org>,
<tony@...mide.com>, <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<lrg@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: helper routine to extract
regulator_init_data
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:49:30PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:40:26PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>
> > +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> > @@ -2673,7 +2673,8 @@ struct regulator_dev *regulator_register(struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
> > BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&rdev->notifier);
> >
> > /* find device_node and attach it */
> > - rdev->dev.of_node = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, regulator_desc->name);
> > + rdev->dev.of_node = of_find_node_by_name(dev->parent->of_node,
> > + regulator_desc->name);
> >
>
> Is that going to do the right thing if you've got a MFD which does
> register each regulator as a separate device?
Based on my understanding, 1:1 is just a special case of N:1. I
failed to see any problem having it work with registering each
regulator as a separate device.
> Might be best to just
> search within dev and get drivers to pass the "real" device in when
> registering the regulator rather than the virtual device.
>
It should also work, but it will also change the API slightly for
non-dt users. I'm not sure it's something we want.
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists