[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024185707.GA3399@elliptictech.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:57:07 -0400
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] kmemleak: Report previously found leaks even after
an error
On 2011-10-04 17:14 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2011-10-04 21:50 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On 4 October 2011 18:45, Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com> wrote:
> > > Cool, I'll try this out. Kmemleak rarely stays alive for more than a
> > > few days on my desktop before shutting itself down due to an allocation
> > > failure, so this should be really handy.
> >
> > You can have a look at /proc/slabinfo and meminfo and see if there are
> > any really big leaks. In general the kmemleak objects number is higher
> > than the sum of all the other slab objects (but I haven't done any
> > statistics). Hopefully kmemleak doesn't leak memory :) (I should add
> > some simple checks though).
>
> I don't think the failures that cause kmemleak to shut down in my case
> are actually caused by a memory leak. The machine is rather old and
> has only 1G of RAM. I think kmemleak is just failing to allocate during
> a period of real memory pressure.
FWIW, I applied this patch on top of 3.0.7 and I can successfully read
the debugfs entry after kmemleak shuts down.
Thanks,
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists