[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024193342.GA27011@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:33:42 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Cc: guenter.roeck@...csson.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linus.ml.walleij@...il.com" <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>,
"zdevai@...il.com" <zdevai@...il.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
"khali@...ux-fr.org" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
"thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com"
<thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
"maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com" <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] IIO:hwmon interface client driver.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:58:49PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 10/24/11 16:39, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Is div_s64 really necessary, or would
> >
> > result = (long)val * (long)scaleint +
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST((s64)val * (s64)scalepart,
> > 1000000000LL);
> >
> > work as well ?
> Not if you want it to compile on arm v5 by the look of it.
>
> ERROR: "__aeabi_ldivmod" [drivers/staging/iio/iio_hwmon.ko] undefined!
You know, div64 is there to deal with the case of _sanely_ dividing
a 64-bit number by a 32-bit number - there should be absolutely no
question about _not_ using it if that's the operation you are wanting
to perform.
Expecting gcc to do a better job without using div64 is just asking for
bad code on 32-bit platforms.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists