linux-kernel - Re: 3.1rc10 null pointer dereference ideapad_backlight_notify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1319493108.21408.YahooMailNeo@web25602.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:51:48 +0100 (BST)
From:	Sam Tygier <samtygier@...oo.co.uk>
To:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 3.1rc10 null pointer dereference ideapad_backlight_notify_power

>On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Ike Panhc wrote:
>
>> This issue has been reported[1] and patch[2] is ready.
>> 
>> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org/msg02340.html
>> 
>> [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org/msg02343.html
>>    http://www.mail-archive.com/platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org/msg02346.html
>> 
>
>It certainly looks like the patch in [2] will fix the issue, but it looks 
>like those are from a couple months ago and I'm still not seeing it in 
>linux-next.  Matthew, how is this going to Linus and will it be cc'd to 
>stable@...r.kernel.org?


the patch works for me (i applied it to kernel between r10 and 3.1 final). for some reason i don't understand i had to apply the patch by hand.


my git diff says:

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
index 0c59541..36953bd 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
@@ -492,6 +492,9 @@ static void ideapad_backlight_notify_power(struct ideapad_private *priv)
 {
        unsigned long power;
        struct backlight_device *blightdev = priv->blightdev;
+       
+       if (!blightdev)
+               return;
 
        if (read_ec_data(ideapad_handle, 0x18, &power))
                return;


i am not quite sure of the etiquette, should I repost the patch in its original form, or my version, or can someone else get this included.

thanks

sam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/