linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] h8300: Move gpio.h to gpio-internal.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACxGe6vvbbBk0HYPe646K075QoS0k3nOqJCyPSwMw9Nd=8k05A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:40:11 +0200
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
	Grant Likely <grant@...retlab.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] h8300: Move gpio.h to gpio-internal.h

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:10:04AM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> This of course should go via the h8300 tree instead of the gpio tree.
>
> If you look at the commit history there's not been much h8300 specific
> work going on for quite some time now - all the commits have been going
> via other trees - so since it's basically a gpiolib cleanup I figure
> it'd be less work for Sato-san if you were able to pick it up.

Okay, will do.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/