[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024024416.GB24581@zhy>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:44:17 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH -rt 5/5] cpufreq: get rid of
get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus()
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:12:20AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, Yong Zhang wrote:
>
> > Fix below false positive (seems this is not a real deadlock scenario)
> > lockdep warning:
>
> This looks like you caused it with patch 1.
Hmmm, yup.
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE will be under cpu_hotplug.lock.
> Both need a bit more
> thought, but thanks for catching that.
No sure whether it's big issue or not.
Mind showing more about your concern?
Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists