[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024090734.GD8708@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:07:34 +0200
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
patches@...aro.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
lrg@...com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: helper routine to extract
regulator_init_data
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:22:19AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> [111020 09:31]:
> >
> > That's where a DT entry specific configuration string might be the best
> > option as it still allows describing the hardware using DT standards,
> > while also allowing board specific configuration too.
>
> Hmm, actually, can't we just pass the board specific configuration in
> the board specific .dts file and then it gets merged in with the
> arch independent DT node?
It would be fine to, say, have a omap-specific board configuration
node for collecting things that really don't fit anywhere else. That
would be in some ways analogous to the way we've decided to use top a
top level node for describing a machines audio complex.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists