[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EA52FCF.2090508@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:58:47 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghukt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Xen <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] debugfs: Renaming of xen functions and change
unsigned to u32
On 10/24/2011 03:49 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:34:59AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32.
>
> Why not just rename when you move the functions? Why the extra step?
>
Intention was only clarity. Yes, if this patch is an overhead, I 'll
combine both the patches.
> greg k-h
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists