[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111025104005.733cd419@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:40:05 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the s390 tree
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:39:46 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 25, 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in
> > arch/s390/kernel/suspend.c between commit 4de2166b1804 ("[S390] sparse:
> > fix sparse warnings about missing prototypes") from the s390 tree and
> > commit 85055dd805f0 ("PM / Hibernate: Include storage keys in hibernation
> > image on s390") from the pm tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>
> The fix looks correct to me, so please carry it going forward (unless
> Martin decides to pull it into his tree).
I could add the git commit 85055dd805f0 from the pm tree to git390 and fix
the merge conflict in the new sparse patch. Dunno if it is worthwhile.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists