[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EA6AE87.5000309@parallels.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:41:43 +0400
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
CC: "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] SUNRPC: introduce helpers for reference counted
rpcbind clients
25.10.2011 15:16, Trond Myklebust пишет:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 14:16 +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> v6:
>> 1) added write memory barrier to rpcb_set_local to make sure, that rpcbind
>> clients become valid before rpcb_users assignment
>> 2) explicitly set rpcb_users to 1 instead of incrementing it (looks clearer from
>> my pow).
>>
>> v5: fixed races with rpcb_users in rpcb_get_local()
>>
>> This helpers will be used for dynamical creation and destruction of rpcbind
>> clients.
>> Variable rpcb_users is actually a counter of lauched RPC services. If rpcbind
>> clients has been created already, then we just increase rpcb_users.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@...allels.com>
>>
>> ---
>> net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
>> index e45d2fb..9fcdb42 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
>> @@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ static struct rpc_program rpcb_program;
>> static struct rpc_clnt * rpcb_local_clnt;
>> static struct rpc_clnt * rpcb_local_clnt4;
>>
>> +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rpcb_clnt_lock);
>> +unsigned int rpcb_users;
>> +
>> struct rpcbind_args {
>> struct rpc_xprt * r_xprt;
>>
>> @@ -161,6 +164,57 @@ static void rpcb_map_release(void *data)
>> kfree(map);
>> }
>>
>> +static int rpcb_get_local(void)
>> +{
>> + int cnt;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&rpcb_clnt_lock);
>> + if (rpcb_users)
>> + rpcb_users++;
>> + cnt = rpcb_users;
>> + spin_unlock(&rpcb_clnt_lock);
>> +
>> + return cnt;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void rpcb_put_local(void)
>> +{
>> + struct rpc_clnt *clnt = rpcb_local_clnt;
>> + struct rpc_clnt *clnt4 = rpcb_local_clnt4;
>> + int shutdown;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&rpcb_clnt_lock);
>> + if (--rpcb_users == 0) {
>> + rpcb_local_clnt = NULL;
>> + rpcb_local_clnt4 = NULL;
>> + }
>> + shutdown = !rpcb_users;
>> + spin_unlock(&rpcb_clnt_lock);
>> +
>> + if (shutdown) {
>> + /*
>> + * cleanup_rpcb_clnt - remove xprtsock's sysctls, unregister
>> + */
>> + if (clnt4)
>> + rpc_shutdown_client(clnt4);
>> + if (clnt)
>> + rpc_shutdown_client(clnt);
>> + }
>> + return;
>
> I'm removing this before applying...
>
Sorry, but I don't understand what exactly you are removing, and why?
>> +}
>> +
>
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists