linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (block ?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+icZUUO3rxx4OFBNbHm4J3BFH66HBDY2LXC6-r2WY8ioo+8Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:10:55 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (block ?)

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> *Note well*
>>
>> This tree has nate had any build testing at all.  As such, it probably
>> doesn't build :-) This tree is really just a roll up of the current state
>> of the trees when the v3.2 merge window opened.  It will not be put into
>> the build system referred to below.
>>
>
> I have generated a single linux-next (next-20111025) patch on top of
> v3.1, it's approx. 100M!
>
> $ du -h patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch
> 96M     patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch
>
> I noticed this build-failure:
>
>  CC      block/blk-throttle.o
>  CC [M]  fs/fuse/dir.o
> /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:
> In function 'blk_throtl_drain':
> /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:1221:2:
> error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_is_held'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> make[5]: *** [block/blk-throttle.o] Error 1
> make[4]: *** [block] Error 2
>
> This happens with Debian's gcc-4.6 (4.6.1-16) and default
> KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS value.
>
> - Sedat -
>

Looks like "#include <linux/lockdep.h>" is missing in block/blk-throttle.c?

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/