linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (block ?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+icZUUYcdS5C5DL3RnSbkWWu4hVuq4ecy5u1+0QLwEuSzJMeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:43:08 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (block ?)

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> On 2011-10-25 15:10, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> *Note well*
>>>>
>>>> This tree has nate had any build testing at all.  As such, it probably
>>>> doesn't build :-) This tree is really just a roll up of the current state
>>>> of the trees when the v3.2 merge window opened.  It will not be put into
>>>> the build system referred to below.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have generated a single linux-next (next-20111025) patch on top of
>>> v3.1, it's approx. 100M!
>>>
>>> $ du -h patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch
>>> 96M     patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch
>>>
>>> I noticed this build-failure:
>>>
>>>  CC      block/blk-throttle.o
>>>  CC [M]  fs/fuse/dir.o
>>> /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:
>>> In function 'blk_throtl_drain':
>>> /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:1221:2:
>>> error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_is_held'
>>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>>
>>> make[5]: *** [block/blk-throttle.o] Error 1
>>> make[4]: *** [block] Error 2
>>>
>>> This happens with Debian's gcc-4.6 (4.6.1-16) and default
>>> KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS value.
>>>
>>> - Sedat -
>>>
>>
>> Looks like "#include <linux/lockdep.h>" is missing in block/blk-throttle.c?
>
> Hmm, I wonder why it isn't triggering for cfq-iosched.o or elevator.o as
> well. Is blk-throttle modular? What is your .config?
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>

CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING=y

My kernel-config is attached.


- Sedat -

Download attachment "config-3.1.0-next20111025.1-686-small" of type "application/octet-stream" (91399 bytes)