linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] m68knommu arch updates for 3.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxondM5y9c2vLTnO87bTQeS4RB2LcH06YSozNZr+joZxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:27:07 +0200
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
Cc:	gerg@...inux.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, uclinux-dev@...inux.org,
	geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] m68knommu arch updates for 3.2

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com> wrote:
>
> I don't think I will get back onto kernel.org anytime soon, I am in
> the "geographically-isolated developers" group :-(
>
> But I have put a signed tag on the top commit now, with the top
> commit and repository info. Is this what you are looking for?

That works for me, except that the gpg key is just not signed by
anybody, so it doesn't really add any real trust. The fact that you
reply sanely to and react to your email address is what makes me trust
you are you, and it's not like I really worry about the m68k
architecture as a security issue ;)

So let's hope you can get your gpg key signed, but apart from that
detail you did things right and everything looks fine. So pulled,

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/