linux-kernel - Re: linux-next failure on tegra due to conflicts between PPI and irq domain patches and irq.h->module.h include removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOesGMiCvFypQ6MbkTARxH3i3YTgYqSVcUwXe=2tdqSqufXtzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:01:31 -0700
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next failure on tegra due to conflicts between PPI and irq
 domain patches and irq.h->module.h include removal

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
> Olof,
>
> On 10/25/2011 04:48 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looks like Marc added new references to irq_start in his PPI patch,
>> and Rob removed it in parallel. Also, irq_offset is no longer
>> available. Looks like you need to respin your patch, Marc.
>>
>> arch/arm/common/gic.c: In function 'gic_dist_init':
>> arch/arm/common/gic.c:290: error: 'irq_start' undeclared (first use in
>> this function)
>> arch/arm/common/gic.c:290: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
>> reported only once
>> arch/arm/common/gic.c:290: error: for each function it appears in.)
>> arch/arm/common/gic.c:296: error: 'struct gic_chip_data' has no member
>> named 'irq_offset'
>
> I fixed this and sent a pull request yesterday to Arnd.

Ah, oops, forgot to check for already-posted-patches. :) Excellent.


>> The second error is because of the change from Paul that removes
>> module.h from irq.h:
>>
>> arch/arm/common/gic.c: In function 'gic_init':
>> arch/arm/common/gic.c:620: error: 'THIS_MODULE' undeclared (first use
>> in this function)
>>
>> Looks odd that I should need to include module.h on my own just to use
>> irq defines. Paul?
>>
>
> THIS_MODULE is needed by irq.h itself in irq_alloc_descs, so it probably
> needs to be added back.

Well, the new export.h that defines THIS_MODULE probably needs to be
added to irq.h, yes.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/