[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111025090521.51cbd1ce@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:05:21 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Swen Schillig <swen@...t.ibm.com>,
Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jan Glauber <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the s390 tree
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:16:01 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi tree got a conflict in
> drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c between commit 9c20b3dd8479 ("[S390] qdio:
> EQBS retry after CCQ 96") from the s390 tree and commit dfe5bb506172
> ("[SCSI] qdio: base support for hardware data router with zfcp") from the
> scsi tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Looks good. Thanks Stephen.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists