[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111025184421.5da0ec4a2551e162cfa6bd78@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:44:21 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
kernel/sched_stats.h between commit f6116715d1ba ("[S390] cputime: add
sparse checking and cleanup") from the cputime tree and commit
ee30a7b2fc07 ("locking, sched: Annotate thread_group_cputimer as raw")
from the tip tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc kernel/sched_stats.h
index a455e62,87f9e36..0000000
--- a/kernel/sched_stats.h
+++ b/kernel/sched_stats.h
@@@ -282,9 -282,10 +282,9 @@@ static inline void account_group_user_t
if (!cputimer->running)
return;
- spin_lock(&cputimer->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&cputimer->lock);
- cputimer->cputime.utime =
- cputime_add(cputimer->cputime.utime, cputime);
+ cputimer->cputime.utime += cputime;
- spin_unlock(&cputimer->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&cputimer->lock);
}
/**
@@@ -305,9 -306,10 +305,9 @@@ static inline void account_group_system
if (!cputimer->running)
return;
- spin_lock(&cputimer->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&cputimer->lock);
- cputimer->cputime.stime =
- cputime_add(cputimer->cputime.stime, cputime);
+ cputimer->cputime.stime += cputime;
- spin_unlock(&cputimer->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&cputimer->lock);
}
/**
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists