[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB904C5425BA6F4E8424B3B51A1414D16D3BA94A82@NWD2CMBX1.ad.analog.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 04:53:00 -0400
From: "Zhang, Sonic" <Sonic.Zhang@...log.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Sonic Zhang <sonic.adi@...il.com>
CC: "uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org"
<uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH] mutex:SMP:bf561:Run smp memory
barrier after take atomic lock in mutex_fastpath APIs.
Hi Mike,
Our SMP atomic implementation doesn't include memory barrier. Is it a better way to add barrier there?
Thanks
Sonic
>-----Original Message-----
>From: uclinux-dist-devel-bounces@...ckfin.uclinux.org
>[mailto:uclinux-dist-devel-bounces@...ckfin.uclinux.org] On
>Behalf Of Mike Frysinger
>Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 3:54 PM
>To: Sonic Zhang
>Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org; Ingo Molnar; LKML
>Subject: Re: [uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH] mutex:SMP:bf561:Run
>smp memory barrier after take atomic lock in mutex_fastpath APIs.
>
>unfortunately, this is incorrect. please see the thread:
>https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/29/233
>-mike
>_______________________________________________
>Uclinux-dist-devel mailing list
>Uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
>https://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dist-devel
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists