linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] 9p changes fro merge window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFkjPTmJNv9WFfhL6RRN3mVGniU57Sxj-mLBfN1-KeR8RKxf9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:57:29 -0500
From:	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	V9FS Developers <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] 9p changes fro merge window

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> What's the preferred maintainer workflow?  I had been fetching and then rebasing, which seemed to keep my shortlog clean of merge commits and the outstanding patches towards the top.  Should I just be pulling from upstream and not caring about the merge commits?
>
> Hell no.
>
> Why do you pull from upstream? What does that add to *your*
> development? Don't do it. Pick a place to start, and just develop
> things. Ask me to pull.
>

okay, I guess I was always updating to make sure I was integration
testing against the tip, but I can do that in throw-away branches so
that the branch I ask you to pull from keeps somewhat more sane.

            -eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/