linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] big staging merge for 3.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111026142301.GA4732@marke.airties>
Date:	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:23:01 +0100
From:	Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] big staging merge for 3.2

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:59:40PM +0200, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here is the big staging merge for 3.2
> >
> > Note, I ended up merging this with your 3.1 release to resolve a merge
> > issue with one of the comedi drivers to fix a build issue.  If you want
> > me to redo the tree without this merge, I'll be glad to do so and let
> > you do it :)
> 
> I don't hate merges that make sense, and that one looks fine. You
> picked a logical merge point, and you wrote a merge message that
> explains it. No problem.
> 
> > There's a lot of patches in here, and the overall diff is quite
> > impressive:
> >  834 files changed, 103718 insertions(+), 230262 deletions(-)
> 
> Hmm... I only get
> 
>  725 files changed, 103936 insertions(+), 180480 deletions(-)
> 
> Which is still good, but nothing like your numbers. Where did you find
> the extra 50k lines?
> 
> > All patches have been in the -next releases for a while now.
> 
> So I got several conflicts with the networking tree. Most of them were
> trivial (eg driver removal conflicting with somebody trying to fix up
> the now dead driver), but I really hope somebody looks at the
> resulting drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c file.
> 
> That driver wasn't removed, it was consolidated as one big file, and
> so the fixes to the original files needed to be resolved. I tried to
> do that correctly, but there's the skb_frag_dma_map() change and the
> removal of .ndo_set_multicast_list, and while I think I did it right,
> I really want somebody who knows that code to double check me.
> 
> Appropriate people to do that added to the cc,
> 
>                  Linus

Hi Linus,

The code changes look good, but it also needs the removal of a NETDEV_1000 dependency in the Kconfig file.

I sent a patch for these changes yesterday, you can find it here :
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg177938.html

It's practically identical to your fixes, except for the Kconfig change.

Cheers,

Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/