lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111026172049.GD355@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:20:49 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	axboe@...nel.dk, jgarzik@...ox.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	hch@...radead.org, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] block: add blk_queue_dead()

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 06:02:05PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> There are a number of QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD tests.  Add blk_queue_dead()
> macro and use it.
> 
> This patch doesn't introduce any functional difference.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c       |    6 +++---
>  block/blk-exec.c       |    2 +-
>  block/blk-sysfs.c      |    4 ++--
>  block/blk-throttle.c   |    4 ++--
>  block/blk.h            |    2 +-
>  include/linux/blkdev.h |    1 +
>  6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 1efb943..7d39897 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_allocated_queue_node);
>  
>  int blk_get_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>  {
> -	if (likely(!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, &q->queue_flags))) {
> +	if (likely(!blk_queue_dead(q))) {
>  		kobject_get(&q->kobj);
>  		return 0;

I thought DEAD flag is now synchronized with queue lock. So the protocol
is that caller should be holding queue lock here first?

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ