| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:14:53 +0200 From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> To: "Hebenstreit, Michael" <michael.hebenstreit@...el.com> Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: FATAL: kenrel too old - message On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Hebenstreit, Michael <michael.hebenstreit@...el.com> wrote: > Can someone explain me why even an ldd on a dynamic executable gives a "kernel too old"? I understand that linking to a gcc that does not support the kernel causes this problem at runtime, but why does ldd fail? Are there other ways to diagnose this? > Because ldd executes the binary to get it's dependencies. It's just a bash script. -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists