[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EA95788.90808@ilyx.ru>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:07:20 +0400
From: Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] TTY: pty, fix pty counting in "/proc/sys/kernel/pty/nr"
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 01:48:35PM +0400, Ilya Zykov wrote:
>> Regression for commit: 24d406a6bf736f7aebdc8fa0f0ec86e0890c6d24
>> Commit: 24d406a6b accepted in Linux 3.1.
>> Disscussed on linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org "subject: [PATCH] TTY: pty, fix pty counting"
>> and not accepted.
>> Although, I think it's clear.
>
> Ilya, is there some reason you are ignoring the tty maintainer and
> sending these to Linus directly? These patches need to be tested in
> linux-next, so at the earliest, they can be merged into Linus's tree for
> 3.3, they are NOT 3.2 material, especially given that they are not even
> accepted by the current tty developers.
>
> So please work with us, and don't try to circumvent the existing
> process, it is not the way we work here.
>
> Especially as this specific patch was already rejected, for very good
> reasons, why are you ignoring those reasons?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
OK, I understand you rules.
But I don't understand, what for, you accept patch(commit: 24d406a6bf736f7aebdc8fa0f0ec86e0890c6d24),
where "pty" call tty_driver_remove_tty(), only for invoke its own route(pty_unix98_remove).
Thank you.
Ilya.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists