[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111027143119.GD7491@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:31:19 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 10/13] block, cfq: unlink cfq_io_context's
immediately
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 02:31:07PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
[..]
> -void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc)
> +void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc, struct request_queue *locked_q)
> {
> + struct request_queue *last_q = locked_q;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> if (ioc == NULL)
> return;
>
> BUG_ON(atomic_long_read(&ioc->refcount) <= 0);
> + if (locked_q)
> + lockdep_assert_held(locked_q->queue_lock);
>
Looks like lockdep_assert_held() can't be used if !CONFIG_LOCKDEP. So
Jens had put following patch to fix one compilation issue. You might
want to provide a null definition of lockdep_assert_held() in case
of !CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
commit 334c2b0b8b2ab186fa198413386cba41fffcb4f2
Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Date: Tue Oct 25 15:51:48 2011 +0200
blk-throttle: use queue_is_locked() instead of lockdep_is_held()
We can't use the latter if !CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists