lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201110272206.26848.grabner@icg.tugraz.at>
Date:	Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:06:26 +0200
From:	Markus Grabner <grabner@....tugraz.at>
To:	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>
Cc:	devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: staging: line6 driver status

On Thursday 27 October 2011 11:43:21 you wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:28:59AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> What is the status of the line6 staging driver?  There is no TODO file
> >> so I'm not sure what is blocking it from leaving staging.
> > 
> > That's a good question.  I don't really know the status of the driver at
> > the moment, does anyone else?
> 
> I have one question about the design of the driver:
> 
> Do we really need the sysfs attributes which boil down to MIDI
> commands?  I think a userspace library provides a better interface
> because the MIDI commands/values vary between device models and bloat
> the driver.  Generic sound recording and MIDI software would talk to
> the driver.  Utilities to control the device could link against the
> userspace library.
> 
> By splitting the code into the kernel MIDI/pcm driver and a userspace
> control library which uses MIDI we can slim down the kernel driver and
> leave the large variation of MIDI commands/values to a library that
> the community can improve for specific device models.
> 
> This will make the driver smaller and easier for review.
I actually already started to work on this, but progress is slow since I'm 
quite busy with other things. As soon as there is a convenient way to access 
device parameters via user space code, I agree that the corresponding sysfs 
attributes should be removed from the driver.

	Kind regards,
		Markus


-- 
Markus Grabner
Institute for Computer Graphics and Vision
Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 16a/II, 8010 Graz, Austria
WWW: http://www.icg.tugraz.at/Members/grabner
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ