[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111027153452.47b195f8@notabene.brown>
Date:	Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:34:52 +1100
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	mark gross <markgross@...gnar.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lsusd - The Linux SUSpend Daemon
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:31:06 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
wrote:
> 
> On Friday 2011-10-21 07:23, NeilBrown wrote:
> >At:
> >    git://neil.brown.name/lsusd
> >or
> >    http://neil.brown.name/git/lsusd
> >
> >you can find a bunch of proof-of-concept sample code that implements a
> >"Linux SUSpend Daemon" with client support library and test programs.
> >
> >  lsused:
> >      lsused (which needs a better name) listens on the socket
> >            /var/run/suspend/registration
> 
> (lx)suspd and (lx)susp_eventd?
> NB: The short form of Linux is usually lx (not l). Also, yours would be
> the first I know to explicitly contain l/lx, which I think is rather
> redundant, given I'll never run a type of suspend other than the linux
> one anyway.
Good points - thanks.
I'll certainly consider them if/when I try to decide on a better name.
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
