[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EA8F216.30807@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:54:30 +0200
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, giancarlo.asnaghi@...com
Subject: Re: x86/Kconfig: where to place a new chipset
On 10/27/2011 03:17 AM, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm currently working on a PCIe chipset (or IO-Hub), called STA2X11.
> The device hosts a number of peripherals (sata, ether, spi, uart, ...)
> and a DMA controller. The individual PCI functions can't be enabled
> by themselves, as chip support must be activated first. This is both
> because some internal mappings must be setup and because internal
> device functions rely on the internal DMA engine. Actually, an
> instance of swiotlb is being used.
>
> While I'm sure core code should be in arch/x86/platform (and there is
> where I placed the initialization code), I'm wondering where should
> the device fall in the Kconfig tree. I tend to put it in the
> X86_32_NON_STANDARD stanza, even if the resulting kernel will also
> work on standard computers (the "SGI Visual Workstation" config option
> does the same).
>
> On the other hand, the device can either be the core chipset (main use
> case) or it can be plugged on a PCIe board.
>
The nonstandard platform location seems fine to me.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists