linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7836.1319699116@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:05:16 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:27:17 +0200, Herbert Xu said:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 05:42:01PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > When CONFIG_NET is not enabled:
>
> Thanks, I'll add this patch.

> diff --git a/crypto/Kconfig b/crypto/Kconfig
> +	select NET

Are there any use cases where a config (probably embedded) would wantq
CRYPTO_USER but not CRYPTO_NET?  Would seem a shame to pull in the entire
CONFIG_NET stuff just for what appears to me to be a few utility routines (I
know there's still a few people out there fighting kernel bloat).

In any case, I suspect that sort of restructuring will be 3.3 material - this does
look like the right fix for this merge window.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped