lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1319804012-16346-13-git-send-email-miklos@szeredi.hu>
Date:	Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:13:31 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	hch@...radead.org
Cc:	viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com,
	mszeredi@...e.cz
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] vfs: count unlinked inodes

From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>

Add a new counter to the superblock that keeps track of unlinked but
not yet deleted inodes.

Do not WARN_ON if set_nlink is called with zero count, just do a
ratelimited printk.  This happens on xfs and probably other
filesystems after an unclean shutdown when the filesystem reads inodes
which already have zero i_nlink.  Reported by Christoph Hellwig.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Tested-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/inode.c         |   85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/fs.h |   61 ++++---------------------------------
 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index e2d3633..55447f9 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <linux/ima.h>
 #include <linux/cred.h>
 #include <linux/buffer_head.h> /* for inode_has_buffers */
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
 #include "internal.h"
 
 /*
@@ -241,6 +242,11 @@ void __destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	BUG_ON(inode_has_buffers(inode));
 	security_inode_free(inode);
 	fsnotify_inode_delete(inode);
+	if (!inode->i_nlink) {
+		WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count) == 0);
+		atomic_long_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
+	}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
 	if (inode->i_acl && inode->i_acl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
 		posix_acl_release(inode->i_acl);
@@ -268,6 +274,85 @@ static void destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
 		call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, i_callback);
 }
 
+/**
+ * drop_nlink - directly drop an inode's link count
+ * @inode: inode
+ *
+ * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
+ * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.  In cases
+ * where we are attempting to track writes to the
+ * filesystem, a decrement to zero means an imminent
+ * write when the file is truncated and actually unlinked
+ * on the filesystem.
+ */
+void drop_nlink(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	WARN_ON(inode->i_nlink == 0);
+	inode->__i_nlink--;
+	if (!inode->i_nlink)
+		atomic_long_inc(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drop_nlink);
+
+/**
+ * clear_nlink - directly zero an inode's link count
+ * @inode: inode
+ *
+ * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
+ * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.  See
+ * drop_nlink() for why we care about i_nlink hitting zero.
+ */
+void clear_nlink(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	if (inode->i_nlink) {
+		inode->__i_nlink = 0;
+		atomic_long_inc(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_nlink);
+
+/**
+ * set_nlink - directly set an inode's link count
+ * @inode: inode
+ * @nlink: new nlink (should be non-zero)
+ *
+ * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
+ * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.
+ */
+void set_nlink(struct inode *inode, unsigned int nlink)
+{
+	if (!nlink) {
+		printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO
+			"set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on %s inode %li\n",
+			inode->i_sb->s_type->name, inode->i_ino);
+		clear_nlink(inode);
+	} else {
+		/* Yes, some filesystems do change nlink from zero to one */
+		if (inode->i_nlink == 0)
+			atomic_long_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
+
+		inode->__i_nlink = nlink;
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_nlink);
+
+/**
+ * inc_nlink - directly increment an inode's link count
+ * @inode: inode
+ *
+ * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
+ * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.  Currently,
+ * it is only here for parity with dec_nlink().
+ */
+void inc_nlink(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	if (WARN_ON(inode->i_nlink == 0))
+		atomic_long_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
+
+	inode->__i_nlink++;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(inc_nlink);
+
 void address_space_init_once(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	memset(mapping, 0, sizeof(*mapping));
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index b9a4920..d7478da 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1477,6 +1477,9 @@ struct super_block {
 
 	struct shrinker s_shrink;	/* per-sb shrinker handle */
 
+	/* Number of inodes with nlink == 0 but still referenced */
+	atomic_long_t s_remove_count;
+
 	/* Being remounted read-only */
 	int s_readonly_remount;
 };
@@ -1761,31 +1764,10 @@ static inline void mark_inode_dirty_sync(struct inode *inode)
 	__mark_inode_dirty(inode, I_DIRTY_SYNC);
 }
 
-/**
- * set_nlink - directly set an inode's link count
- * @inode: inode
- * @nlink: new nlink (should be non-zero)
- *
- * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
- * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.
- */
-static inline void set_nlink(struct inode *inode, unsigned int nlink)
-{
-	inode->__i_nlink = nlink;
-}
-
-/**
- * inc_nlink - directly increment an inode's link count
- * @inode: inode
- *
- * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
- * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.  Currently,
- * it is only here for parity with dec_nlink().
- */
-static inline void inc_nlink(struct inode *inode)
-{
-	inode->__i_nlink++;
-}
+extern void inc_nlink(struct inode *inode);
+extern void drop_nlink(struct inode *inode);
+extern void clear_nlink(struct inode *inode);
+extern void set_nlink(struct inode *inode, unsigned int nlink);
 
 static inline void inode_inc_link_count(struct inode *inode)
 {
@@ -1793,35 +1775,6 @@ static inline void inode_inc_link_count(struct inode *inode)
 	mark_inode_dirty(inode);
 }
 
-/**
- * drop_nlink - directly drop an inode's link count
- * @inode: inode
- *
- * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
- * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.  In cases
- * where we are attempting to track writes to the
- * filesystem, a decrement to zero means an imminent
- * write when the file is truncated and actually unlinked
- * on the filesystem.
- */
-static inline void drop_nlink(struct inode *inode)
-{
-	inode->__i_nlink--;
-}
-
-/**
- * clear_nlink - directly zero an inode's link count
- * @inode: inode
- *
- * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
- * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.  See
- * drop_nlink() for why we care about i_nlink hitting zero.
- */
-static inline void clear_nlink(struct inode *inode)
-{
-	inode->__i_nlink = 0;
-}
-
 static inline void inode_dec_link_count(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	drop_nlink(inode);
-- 
1.7.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ