[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111028130535.GA2752@citd.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:05:35 +0200
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@...d.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config: Add 'make kvmconfig'
On 28.10.2011 14:29, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@...d.de> wrote:
>
> > On 28.10.2011 09:54, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > ? It would be very obvious at a glance what it does.
> > > >
> > > > This fits in the generic "I have a .config and I want to enable an
> > > > additional option" functionality:
> > > >
> > > > make oldconfig CONFIG_KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE=y
> > > >
> > > > Don't we already have that support? I seem to remember it flying
> > > > by. Or was it just a proposal that never got implemented?
> > >
> > > Well, it would be nice to have something (much) shorter and more
> > > obvious, as we really expect to use this frequently.
> > >
> > > Maybe:
> > >
> > > make oldconfig kvm
> >
> > Maybe something more obvious?:
> > make modconfig kvm
> > or
> > make modconfig=kvm
>
> Well, i run distinctly non-modular kernels so modconfig would not be
> particularly good. Also, many of the features enabled are non-modular
> core kernel features to begin with.
I thougt about that just as i send the e-mail, to near to "mod"ular.
What i meant was "mod"ify.
And AFAICS there currently is no "modconfig", only an "allmodconfig"
(and "localmodconfig")
With no letters dropped it would be less ambiguous.
make modifyconfig=kvm
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists