linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Example to show use of uio pgprot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <A42590B4-A0D4-433D-ADA8-57ECBFAB9A6E@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:52:01 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	hjk@...sjkoch.de, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Example to show use of uio pgprot


On Oct 28, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:50:30AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> ---
>> drivers/uio/uio_dpa.c |  200 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/uio/uio_dpa.c
> 
> You do realize this does not build, right?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Yes, it was meant to show Hans and example of why we need to allow a UIO driver to set its own pgprot.  We plan on upstream all that code, but wanted at least to get feedback on the general UIO change.

- k--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/