linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coredump: wait on the core pattern umh at least once

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+bD78itD3dAZiA9eWbB7QXsub3phmareesHEmydawV+AaQNNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:16:52 -0700
From:	Scott James Remnant <scott@...split.com>
To:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: wait on the core pattern umh at least once

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:

> Seems reasonable to me.
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
>

One thing I'm not sure about is whether this will work if there are
actually no readers really reading, just the incremented one. It
seemed to work just fine in testing, but I'd be more comfortable if
someone else could confirm.

Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/