[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111028060534.GB1957@netboy.at.omicron.at>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:05:35 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Chen Jie <chenj@...ote.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: Improve documentation of timekeeeping_adjust()
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:12:42PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> index a5846a8..de8737e 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> @@ -802,14 +802,44 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(s64 offset)
> s64 error, interval = timekeeper.cycle_interval;
> int adj;
>
> + /*
> + * The point of this is to check if the error is greater then half
> + * an interval.
> + *
> + * First we shift it down from NTP_SHIFT to clocksource->shifted nsecs.
> + *
> + * Note we subtract one in the shift, so that error is really error*2.
> + * This "saves" dividing(shifting) intererval twice, but keeps the
> + * (error > interval) comparision as still measuring if error is
> + * larger then half an interval.
> + *
> + * Note: It does not "save" on aggrivation when reading the code.
... or on "aggravation" either :)
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists