[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUSyNcbmmXjFqSVQmsSqGS5xKFt4DSnskkg80UyWoJjLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:52:53 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config: Add 'make kvmconfig'
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:03, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>> The kvmconfig is an x86 specific thing - so it does not belong
>> in the scripts/kconfig/Makefile
>>
>> The *config namespace is general config targets.
>>
>> Suggestion:
>> Move the implmentation to arch/x86/Makefile and name the target
>> something that does not match the *config pattern.
>>
>> Suggestion:
>>
>> make kvmbootable
>>
>> To tell that this convert the current config to a kvmbootable config.
>>
>> And then add the target to the x86 specific help too.
>
> KVM itself is not x86 specific (although this patch obviously is), so
> we'd like to keep at least the naming non-x86.
>
> Furthermore, the functionality generally fits into the pattern that
> 'oldconfig' does: it changes an existing config - so having 'config'
> in the name somewhere makes quite a bit of sense. If i didn't know
> what 'kvmbootable' does i couldnt guess that it touches the .config -
> while the *config pattern makes that patently obvious.
>
> Could we set aside some sort of name for such subsystem specific
> purposes and be done with it? Could we reuse the 'defconfig'
> naming perhaps and make it richer:
>
> make defconfig kvm
>
> or:
>
> make defconfig-kvm
>
> ? It would be very obvious at a glance what it does.
This fits in the generic "I have a .config and I want to enable an additional
option" functionality:
make oldconfig CONFIG_KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE=y
Don't we already have that support? I seem to remember it flying by.
Or was it just a proposal that never got implemented?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists