linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] media: tea5764: reconcile Kconfig symbol and macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:31:43 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] media: tea5764: reconcile Kconfig symbol and
 macro

On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 10:24 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/30/11 10:12, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > 2) I'm not sure why things are done that way. Why can't builtin drivers
> > and loadable drivers default to identical values? But perhaps I'm just
> > misunderstanding the code.
> 
> They could default to identical values.

That would make the cleaning up I'm trying to do now somewhat easier. It
would allow to simplify the drivers a bit too.

> Maybe someone thinks that
> it's more difficult to pass parameters to builtin drivers so they
> just try to use some sane defaults for them instead, whereas it's
> easy (easier) to pass parameters to loadable modules.  ??

Perhaps Mauro or the people at linux-media know the reasoning here. Or
they can show us that I didn't parse the code correctly, of course.


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/