[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82mxcijtaz.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:14:12 +0000
From: Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: time: Improve documentation of timekeeeping_adjust()
On Fri 28 Oct 2011, John Stultz wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 08:05 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:12:42PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> > diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
>> > index a5846a8..de8737e 100644
>> > --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
>> > @@ -802,14 +802,44 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(s64 offset)
>> > s64 error, interval = timekeeper.cycle_interval;
>> > int adj;
>> >
>> > + /*
>> > + * The point of this is to check if the error is greater then half
>> > + * an interval.
>> > + *
>> > + * First we shift it down from NTP_SHIFT to clocksource->shifted nsecs.
>> > + *
>> > + * Note we subtract one in the shift, so that error is really error*2.
>> > + * This "saves" dividing(shifting) intererval twice, but keeps the
>> > + * (error > interval) comparision as still measuring if error is
>> > + * larger then half an interval.
>> > + *
>> > + * Note: It does not "save" on aggrivation when reading the code.
>>
>> ... or on "aggravation" either :)
>
> Sigh. I do need to start using an editor with built in spell checking.
> I'm so poor of a speller (and a typist) its really amazing its not
> worse.
>
> Thanks for catching that.
> -john
s/intererval/interval/
AndyM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists