linux-kernel - Re: HT (Hyper Threading) aware process scheduling doesn't work as it should

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:12:56 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@...os.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HT (Hyper Threading) aware process scheduling doesn't work as
 it should

On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:57:12 +0000 (GMT)
"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@...os.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> It's known that if you want to reach maximum performance on HT
> enabled Intel CPUs you should distribute the load evenly between
> physical cores, and when you have loaded all of them you should then
> load the remaining virtual cores.

this is a bold statement, and patently false if you have to threads of
one process that heavily share data between eachother...
(but true for more independent workloads)

-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/