[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVO_qNoy=AMs4RQOPsNq5dnTsc-=-f70Njf9Hv8eRkx=+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 03:55:50 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
mark gross <markgross@...gnar.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] PM / Sleep: Extended control of
suspend/hibernate interfaces
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> Second, to address the backup problem, we need to allow user space
> processes other than the suspend/hibernate process itself to prevent the
> system from being put into sleep states. A mechanism for that is introduced
> by the second patch in the form of the /dev/sleepctl special device working
> kind of like user space wakelocks on Android (although in a simplified
> fashion).
I also have another similar example: write(fd, buffer, 100*4096).
Suppose only 80*4096 are copied into pages of the file, then someone
run ' echo mem > /sys/power/state ' to trigger system sleep, so only
partial writing is completed before system sleep and data inconsistence
may be caused for the file on filesystem.
But I am not sure if it is possible to happen in reality.
thank,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists