[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lis1q5tc.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:29:43 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep,rtmutex,bug: Show taint flags on error
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 04:36:55 +0100, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
> Currently lock debugging is disabled when the kernel is tainted, with
> a few exceptions. It is already recognised that this can be useful
> for staging modules (TAINT_CRAP), but that also goes for out-of-tree
> modules (TAINT_OOT_MODULE) so long as core kernel developers don't
> have to spend time debugging them. Also, there are several reasons
> for tainting that are unlikely to introduce false locking bug reports
> (e.g. TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND).
>
> Instead of disabling lock debugging, show the taint flags in all
> lockdep and rtmutex-debug error messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists