lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLHWtN+88CErqbDDqT20saDyxLcdca8R2eV9nA9jvjUdGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:32:54 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 6/7] x86, mm: Prepare zone_sizes_init() for unification

Hi David,

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:56 AM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> I'd just fold patch 7 into this, it doesn't make much sense to have add
> CONFIG_HIGHMEM code for 64-bit, for example, just to make the next patch
> simpler.

Actually, I don't agree.

Whenever I've done unification patches, I've always made sure the
patch that does the actual unification is just code shuffling. That
improves bisectability and makes reviewing easier.

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ