linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the hwspinlock tree with the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111101175602.a1cc534d3819edcb8cd2cc77@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:56:02 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the hwspinlock tree with the arm-soc
 tree

Hi Ohad,

Today's linux-next merge of the hwspinlock tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c between commits 3528c58eb9e8 ("OMAP:
omap_device: when building return platform_device instead of
omap_device") and f718e2c034bf ("ARM: OMAP2+: devices: Remove all
omap_device_pm_latency structures") from the arm-soc tree and commit
c3c1250e93a7 ("hwspinlock/core/omap: fix id issues on multiple hwspinlock
devices") from the hwspinlock tree.

I fixed it up (see below) anc can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c
index 36e2109,eb7e509..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c
@@@ -23,6 -24,18 +24,10 @@@
  #include <plat/omap_hwmod.h>
  #include <plat/omap_device.h>
  
+ static struct hwspinlock_pdata omap_hwspinlock_pdata __initdata = {
+ 	.base_id = 0,
+ };
+ 
 -struct omap_device_pm_latency omap_spinlock_latency[] = {
 -	{
 -		.deactivate_func = omap_device_idle_hwmods,
 -		.activate_func   = omap_device_enable_hwmods,
 -		.flags = OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST,
 -	}
 -};
 -
  int __init hwspinlocks_init(void)
  {
  	int retval = 0;
@@@ -40,11 -53,14 +45,13 @@@
  	if (oh == NULL)
  		return -EINVAL;
  
- 	pdev = omap_device_build(dev_name, 0, oh, NULL, 0, NULL, 0, false);
 -	od = omap_device_build(dev_name, 0, oh, &omap_hwspinlock_pdata,
++	pdev = omap_device_build(dev_name, 0, oh, &omap_hwspinlock_pdata,
+ 				sizeof(struct hwspinlock_pdata),
 -				omap_spinlock_latency,
 -				ARRAY_SIZE(omap_spinlock_latency), false);
 -	if (IS_ERR(od)) {
++				NULL, 0, false);
 +	if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
  		pr_err("Can't build omap_device for %s:%s\n", dev_name,
  								oh_name);
 -		retval = PTR_ERR(od);
 +		retval = PTR_ERR(pdev);
  	}
  
  	return retval;

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped