lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EAFA949.5060200@kernel.dk>
Date:	Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:09:45 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

On 2011-11-01 06:15, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
> drivers/md/raid10.c between commit fd01b88c75a7 ("md: remove typedefs:
> mddev_t -> struct mddev") from Linus' tree and commit 5a7bbad27a41
> ("block: remove support for bio remapping from ->make_request") from the
> block tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Fixup looks good, however don't you get the same conflict in basically
all the raid personalities? Fixup is indeed just the simple int -> void
transition, conflict is because of the mddev_t -> struct mddev change
that is now in Linus' tree.

I'll push my pending off to Linus today or tomorrow, so this will be
resolved shortly.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ