[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGr+u+zkPiZpGefstcbJv_cj929icWKXbqFy1uR22Hns1hzFeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:47:24 +0530
From: trisha yad <trisha1march@...il.com>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, oleg@...hat.com, mhocko@...e.cz,
rientjes@...gle.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Issue with core dump
Dear all,
I am running a multithreaded application. So consider a global
variable x which is used by a, b and c thread.
In thread 'a' do abnormal operation(invalid memory access) and kernel
send signal kill to it. In the mean time Thread 'b' and Thread 'c'
got schedule and update
the variable x. when I got the core file, variable x got updated, and
I am not getting actual value that is present at time of crash of
thread a.
But In core file I got updated value of x. I want In core file exact
the same memory status as it at time of abnormal operation(invalid
memory access)
Is there any solution for such problem. ?
I want in core dump the same status of memory as at time of abnormal
operation(invalid memory access).
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists