[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1320155074.2996.190.camel@otta>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:44:34 -0500
From: Peter Bergner <bergner@...t.ibm.com>
To: Santosh Kumar <santoshkumar.a@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Ian Munsie <ianmunsi@....ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: powerpc 476, Little-endian, pte fault
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 08:32 +0530, Santosh Kumar wrote:
> I am using the same compiler as 476 & 440 instruction is almost the same.
Well the 476 implements ISA 2.05, which I think has added a fair amount
over the 440. Not to mention the 476 core that has been released has
a FP unit. I'll note that GCC has support for a 476 with and without
a FP unit, even though AFAIK, we only ship one with a FP unit.
The relevant options are -mcpu=476 (no FP unit) and -mcpu=476fp
(with FP unit). Basically, -mcpu=476 is equivalent to
-mcpu=476fp -msoft-float.
> @@ -53,7 +58,12 @@
> mullw r10,r0,r4 # and get the remainder
> add r8,r8,r0
> subf r6,r10,r6
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INVADER
> 4: stw r7,0(r3) # return the quotient in *r3
> stw r8,4(r3)
> +#else
> +4: stw r7,0(r3) # return the quotient in *r3
> + stw r8,4(r3)
> +#endif
> mr r3,r6 # return the remainder in r3
> blr
This looks like a typo, since you didn't actually swap the offsets
on the stw's like you did in all of the other patch hunks.
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists