lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADZ9YHhcFs9pw09sgrraJzQ3BGs=nOaXAe_966R5ZrgF6BpWRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Nov 2011 23:52:43 +0600
From:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To:	Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux scheduler Questions

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@...il.com> wrote:
> 2 questions on Linux 2.6.x scheduler.
>
> 1.  in Linux 2.6, when a process is waiting for IO. it will be placed
> on the wait queue. is the wait queue per cpu or global ? I do not see
> any field for the wait queue in the runqueue structure.

Where a particular process will wait depends on which scheduling
policy it will use. For a process which has SCHED_FIFO/SCHED_RR
policy, it will be handled by sched_rt scheduler. Where processes are
kept in priority-queue structure. Look for "struct rt_rq" structure.
If it's other than rt process, then processes are kept on red-black
tree (look at "struct cfs_rq" structure).

> 2. Linux 2.6 has the notion of scheduling domain, using an example to
> explain what I am getting at here
>
> In a HT enabled CPU, the CPU has 2 cores, each core has 2 threads.
> there will be 2 levels of domain.
> 1. Domain of lev.1 ==> 2 groups, 1 physical core per group.
> 2. Domain of lev. 0 ==> 2 groups, 1 logical core per group.
> When the load on the 2 logical cores is imbalanced, Linux will migrate
> some jobs from one to another. What if there is an imbalance of
> workload on the 2 physical cores ?
>
Will also try to migrate some jobs from busiest to less busiest core.
First, load balancer will try to find which core has less load, then
will try to find which logical CPU has less load.

Thanks,
Rakib
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ