[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5DZ6KYa_SLVavorPPyV_Ggspa4Cae+eK7oj1mh=O4J4+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:19:54 -0200
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] ARM: imx: Fix typo 'MACH_MX31_3DS_MXC_NAND_USE_BBT'
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
>> ---
>> This is trivial because this is what apparently was intended. On the
>> other hand this should open code paths that were hidden until now. So
>> perhaps this needs the maintainer's approval. (I cannot meaningfully
>> test this.)
>
> I'd like to have this tested by some relevant people before taking it
> myself (added some CCs).
On a mx31pdk board I get the following with this patch applied and
CONFIG_MACH_MX31_3DS_MXC_NAND_USE_BBT selected:
NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xec, Chip ID: 0xaa (Samsung NAND 256MiB
1,8V 8-bit)
Bad block table not found for chip 0
Bad block table not found for chip 0
Scanning device for bad blocks
Registering mxc_nand as whole device
Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists